Showing posts with label 1 Star. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1 Star. Show all posts

Monday, October 1, 2018

Review: Dream Home Dream Life by Reshave Dimri



Genre: Non-Fiction

Description:

According to the description on one on-line retailer this book is “about how to make a self-sustainable and self-reliant house.” The description on Goodreads describes it differently, but also uses verbiage about a self-sustainable and self-reliant house as well as trying to say something about helping the economy, poverty, crime, and other things.

Author:

This is Reshave Dimri’s second of three books currently available. He lives in Delhi, India with his parents and two brothers where he is employed by an IT company.

Appraisal:

This short book has issues. Lots of issues.

While it appears to have been run through a spell checker the syntax is scrambled and the grammar questionable at some point in virtually every paragraph. The purpose of the book was unclear from the description, but once I started reading it made sense for a while. It discusses various techniques and technologies that might be used or are on the verge of becoming available that can make a house more environmentally friendly, cheaper to run and maintain, etc. Just when I thought I understood the book’s scope it started discussing food and health issues. Oh, I guess that’s the “Dream Life” part of the title although it doesn’t get mentioned in the description.

Were it not for difficulty parsing the language the technologies and ideas discussed in the beginning are interesting. I could see this as valuable in giving someone ideas that they could investigate and research elsewhere to get more information. While mentioning solar and wind as a way to generate electricity, the author failed to discuss the potential need for electrical storage using battery banks or other technologies as well as the excessive costs and limitations that might be involved in doing so currently. Some of the ideas and technologies discussed might not be allowed in some areas or countries, but at least those technologies that the fall under the “Dream House” banner are worth knowing about and considering.

As the book progressed it seemed to get less and less focused, jumping around in subjects (going from a chapter on various health subjects to a couple chapters on climate control in your home and then a few chapters later the topic was “Fountain of Youth”). I also found the more I read the more I was questioning the author’s expertise, his sources for the information, and in some cases seriously questioning the information being presented.

Ultimately my conclusion is that even though some of the subjects covered here are worth knowing about, reading Dream Home Dream Life isn’t where I’d recommend going to attempt obtaining that knowledge.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

Format/Typo Issues:

Atrocious editing and proofing with constant grammar problems, use of the wrong word, etc.

Rating: * One Star

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 15-20,000 words

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Review: Toy Soldiers by Michael G. Keller



Genre:  Adventure

Description:

An American hedge fund analyst is sent to appraise an African mine that is controlled by a brutal warlord. When the financier is kidnapped by child soldiers and dragged into their bloody rebellion, he becomes entangled in their struggle and must choose between claiming the immense wealth he worked so hard for, or throwing it away and risking his life for a slim chance to save theirs.

Author:

Michael G. Keller is a filmmaker. Toy Soldiers is his first novel. For more about Keller, visit his website.

Appraisal:

Toy Soldiers is a compelling read in the way a B movie might entice a viewer to keep watching to determine if it is campy or simply bad and having determined it is bad to wonder if it can possibly get worse. On the last point, this story does not disappoint.

The premise of Keller’s story is that greed of global corporations is the cause of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s humanitarian crisis, specifically the demand for coltan, a metallic ore used in electronic equipment. That would be fair as far as it goes, though it ignores refugees from the Rwandan genocide and other tribal wars that have affected stability in DRC for decades and predate demand for coltan. Further, ending all consumption of conflict minerals would not starve tribal warlords of funds. They can and do turn to agricultural products, extortion and other means.

If Toy Soldiers is intended to portray the scope of the DRC conflict, it misinforms. If it is intended to show the human cost through the eyes of its victims, it fails. None of the characters are credible as their actions and emotions are rendered as caricatures by Keller’s puerile writing style.

“He pummeled the mercenary with his pistol, looking him right in the eye as he battered his face into mush.”

“The absent-eyed mercenary spotted Sebu and gasped. Sebu shot his face off.”

“The mercenaries torched huts and dragged young girls, kicking and screaming, into the jungle to satisfy their beastly urges.”

“The children looked up in horror, at the colossus looming over them like a nightmare. He blotted out the sun. They tried to dodge around him, but he swatted them both to the dirt with the back of his ogreish hand.”

The following sentence describes food of boys trying to survive in the jungle and exemplifies the writer’s lackadaisical regard for accuracy.

“Cassava root was pure starch and empty calories, with virtually no nutritional content.”

Starch itself is a nutrient, providing calories needed to avoid starvation. According to “nutritiondata”web site, cassava contains: vitamins--A,C,E K, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B6, folate, B12, pantothenic acid, choline, and betanine, along with minerals--calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, zinc, copper, manganese, and selenium.

Inept handling of a humanitarian crisis aside, the novel is an affront to English literacy.

Diction errors

 “Their vacuous stomachs screamed and pleaded for more,” Unless Keller actually wants to say the stomachs were devoid of intellectual value, I assume he means “empty.”

“Moses’ men leapt up on the truck bed and plucked the new recruits down onto the dirt.” One plucks up, not down. Confused with plunked?

In a limousine, “The general sat unnervingly close by Kaufman’s side, with menacing bodyguards lurking across from them.” Lurk means to wait in hiding as though to ambush, difficult to do in the back of a limo.

Metaphorical sins:

“The setting sun splattered across the sky like a fried egg”

“Exhaustion finally hit him like an avalanche.”

 “Perforated like Swiss cheese, the man’s blood spattered all over him.” (How does one perforate blood?)

Embarrassing alliterations

 “Lantern light lapped against his eye sockets, only making him look angrier.”
“The birds took flight, frantically flapping…”

 “…they ceaselessly swallowed shots” and also “ranted at a rickety podium…”
After a gun battle, “The children…giggled with glee as they sprinted away, through the twists and turns of the wilderness…”

Say what?

“He wasn’t near death – he had somehow passed it, shuffling onward like a headless chicken.”

“The currency trader pried his stunned eyes up from his screen to force a truckling smile.”

“We haven’t found him yet, sir,” the soldier truckled.

 “He had felt flurries of air from several of the rounds whizzing by his head.” Snow flurries, leaves flurry; shock waves made by bullets do not flurry.

“…reached for his AK, but a grizzled foot pinned it to the earth.” Foot covered in gray hair, an old Sasquatch?

“Sebu’s eyes were glassy and delirious with fever.” Delirious eyes?

Clichés ad nauseum:

“The orphans jumped out of their skin.”

“Bang –a rifle accidentally discharged and scared the boys out of their skins.”

“Excuse me,” he called down in a meek voice. Even that made the trekkers leap out of their skin…”

 “You’re alive!” Lumumba exclaimed, literally jumping for joy.

“There was no corner of the market free of monkey business – nothing new under the sun.”
Pretensions

 “The markets were so fraught with sound and fury, but ultimately signified nothing…“

It may be unkind to suppose the writer is trying to imply wisdom through cynicism (and plagiarism). Markets determine how much I pay for a gallon of gasoline or a pound of bacon. To me that’s not nothing.

“The upswings were a drunken orgy of celebration, while the drops were punctuated with melodrama and teeth gnashing.”
Why? Surely traders in a hedge fund would hold both long and 
short positions.

“The corporate animal fed on cash and it grew fatter so it could swallow more 
and more; and it even excreted a little sewage, so people would buzz around like flies, clamoring to do its bidding for a few stray droppings.”

No further comment but an apology for the many risible bits of egregious writing that I have left out.

In an afterward, Keller wrote, “Eagle-eyed editor Nicholas Morine helped trim the fat and punch up the action.” Mr. Morine must then be held equally accountable for the result.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

FYI:

In February 1967 at the age of nineteen years and six months, I debarked the MSTS Gordon onto an LST and landed in Da Nang as a member of the 3rd Marine division. I find this novel’s cartoonish depictions of real-world horror viscerally offensive. As stocks editor (now retired) of Bloomberg’s Tokyo bureau I interviewed analysts, strategists, traders and economists and attest that no such person as Kaufman has ever existed. He is described as both an analyst and financier. Analysts have deep and current knowledge with narrow scope. Financiers hire analysts. I am the author of Dollar Down and Tokyo Enigma, have a humble appreciation for good writing and disdain only for writers too lazy to study the craft.

Anyone interested in the DRC, might read Jason K Stearns’ Dancing in the Glory of Monsters. It was published in 2012, but remains an enlightening work. Those following current debate over the Dodd-Frank Act might watch what happens with Section 1502 dealing with DRC conflict minerals. It has been both praised and damned.

Format/Typo Issues:

Numerous:

Rating: * One Star

Reviewed by: Sam Waite

Approximate word count: 45-50,000 words

Thursday, March 9, 2017

Review: Secret Workplace Romance by Roxanne Amour


Genre: Romance

Description:

“A secret office Romance leads to insomnia, lies, and layoffs!”

Author:

Roxanne Amour writes short, clean romance stories.

Appraisal:

Oh, my. I'll start by quoting the first two paragraphs of this story. Give it a read, then we'll talk.

After an impossible day at the office, the only thing on Jenifer's mind was a steaming, hot bubble bath a tall glass of Merlot and a well-earned night’s rest in her cozy, little bed.

Jennifer Grant put up with the boisterous goings-on coming from the apartment overhead as long as humanly possible finally after tossing and turning for hours she decided something must be done. Nevertheless, three o'clock in the morning was hardly the time to be pacing back and forth accompanied by loud music right over her head.

Did you notice the author doesn't know how to spell the protagonist's name? It can be Jenifer or Jennifer, not both. But both get used throughout the story. However, that's relatively minor and I'm sure will get fixed quickly. So we'll move on.

Is it just me or does the first sentence in the second paragraph run on forever? How many thoughts are there? Maybe it could be broken into a couple sentences. Maybe throw in a comma or two.

Jennifer Grant put up with the boisterous goings-on coming from the apartment overhead as long as humanly possible. Finally, after tossing and turning for hours, she decided something must be done.

Lines like these were popping up constantly in this book. It appears to me the only editing and proofreading help the author had to polish this story was her word processor's spell checker.

As for the underlying story, it's hard to tell how much I'd like it if it had been more readable. Possibly that influenced my attitude toward the characters. But by the end I found the heroine and the two men in her life, the three most important characters, all to be unlikable. On the positive side, this is a romance and it did get to the happily-ever-after ending required of the genre. So it has that going for it.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

Format/Typo Issues:

Numerous proofreading and copyediting errors.

Rating: * One Star

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count:  7-8,000 words

Friday, October 23, 2015

Make Money Online / Chittaranjan Dhurat


Reviewed by: BigAl

Genre: Non-Fiction

Approximate word count: 5-6,000 words

Availability
Kindle US: YES UK: YES Nook: YES Smashwords: YES Paper: NO
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

Chittaranjan Dhurat is a software developer. He has one other work available for your Kindle, a short co-written work on the importance of a healthy diet.

Description:

This book covers seven ways of “making money online” with little or no investment. The seven areas covered (all listed in the book description on retailer sites) are:

Google Adsense
Fiverr
PTC sites (“pay to click”)
Udemy
Amazon Affiliate Marketing
Self-Direct Publishing
Upwork

Appraisal:

The niche this book is aimed at, making money online, is one that certainly has a market. Whether you're looking to use the internet to find a market for your unique skills, as you might do on Fiverr, or find additional ways to generate revenue from an existing website, maybe through advertising using Google Adsense or affiliate income through an affiliate program, understanding the best techniques and partners to maximize your income is valuable information. Maybe that book exists. But this isn't it.

Make Money Online suffers from two fatal flaws. The first is that while it points you in the right direction, too often it seems as though the author thinks the reader is already somewhat familiar with a particular site or money making method and can read between the lines. While you might be able to glean enough to be able to search out what you're missing, that won't always be the case.

For example, when talking about “PTC sites” which are sites that pay you to click on or view advertisements, he explains what they are and how they work, but doesn't give examples of any sites or how you might find them. The description was convoluted enough that I'm still not positive I understand, but think he is talking about sites like Swagbucks. Were I not aware of that site and how it functioned, I'd have had no idea what he was even talking about.

Another example was in the discussion of advertising from Google Adsense in conjunction with Youtube. Among other things the advice was given to “tag with the right keywords” when uploading your video, but no indication of how to determine what those should be is given.

The second issue, which I touched on above, is understanding what the author is trying to say. At one point I actually wondered whether the book was written in another language and translated using Google Translate because the grammar is so bad and the language often convoluted. However, the author uses too many idioms for that to be true. This paragraph is an example of the language used. It is representative, neither the best, nor the worst. I'll leave it to you to decide if it is acceptable.

Whether an educational program course, an expert course or any leisure activity that we needed to seek after, we would ask our companions or family to recommend a class in our neighborhood, if were not able to discover such a class, we would be constrained by the absence of accessibility to surrender the quest for our fantasies, interests or distractions.

I'd like to say that there is enough valuable information buried here that if you're willing to take enough time to parse the language that you'll find enough to make it worthwhile. I can't. Your time would be better spent finding another book on the subject or using the list of sites from the description and Google to dig up more information on your own.

Format/Typo Issues:

Issues with grammar, wrong words, missing words, and convoluted sentences. In roughly 5,000 words this book far exceeded the number of such issues I'd find acceptable in a full size novel.

Rating: * One Star

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Initiated to Kill / Sharlene Almond


Reviewed by: Sam Waite

Genre: Mystery/Suspense

Approximate word count: 90-95,000 words

Availability
Kindle US: YES UK: YES Nook: YES Smashwords: NO Paper: NO
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

Sharlene Almond is “an author of historical/21st century psychological, international thrillers.”

For more, visit Ms. Almond's blog.

Description:

Parallel stories are told of modern day serial murders and those associated with Jack the Ripper.

Appraisal:

Initiated to Kill is an unimaginative rehash of Jack the Ripper crimes with a tired sub plot of a Freemason conspiracy to control the world.

The narrative skips among three time periods, including depictions of the original Ripper murders, modern-day parallels and flashbacks to the heroine’s childhood. The story alternates point of view with sections belonging to the heroine in first person. First person is given to other characters as well, adding confusion to an already poorly constructed story.

For gore aficionados, there are human hearts delivered in wrapped packages to police and detailed slicing up of murder victims, along with rape and torture. Nevertheless, the greatest horror of Initiated to Kill is its butchery of English prose.

* Spelling:

I’m afraid we don’t have any definitive news on Celestina, per say.

Per se”

“…whose-who…”

Who’s who.”

* Grammar:

His thrusts came quick and deep, gripping onto her buttocks.”

Did his thrusts really grip her bottom?

His wife was much older than him,…”

Should be he. Errors of objective and nomative case abound.

* Punctuation:

Her eyes widened, she tried to struggle; her breathing in rapid bursts.”

Semicolons are used extensively in the narrative, often incorrectly. In this example, the semi does not join two complete sentences.

* Diction:

The immaculately gardens and land bespoke of the hard-working staff he employed.”

Bespoke” means tailor made. “Immaculately” is an adverb used here as an adjective.

Eyes averted his openly intense stare.”

Avoided,” not “averted.”

“…the blooming orange trees crammed with the bright orange fruits…”

Cram” means to force something into a confined space. It doesn’t describe a tree loaded with fruit.

When her parents rung me…”

The simple past tense of “ring” is “rang.” “Rung” is a past participle.”

The tension was plausible.”

The tension may have been believable, but I doubt it’s what the writer intended. Perhaps palpable?

The train ambled…”

Amble means to walk slowly.

* Factual errors:

“…hanging ferns sprouting into bloom.”

Ferns don’t bloom.

Duck, peacocks and swans swam leisurely on the still waters.”

Peacocks don’t swim. Also number, singular/plural should be consistent.

* Wooden dialog:

It’s actually a family heirloom. Since I’m the only one that wanted to live in Spain, they said I could have it.” His sophisticated English accent only added to the allure of his overall demeanor.

One would expect a sophisticated speaker to use “who” rather than “that.”

Uh, uh sir...well...a package was delivered at the desk...and well uh, it’s addressed for the CID division.”

* Faulty logic:

The little boy remembered how Charles Dickens spoke of a similar ordeal.”

The boy, later described as five years old, recalls Dickens and relates the memory to his own circumstance.

Valero tightly gripped his paddles (He is in a rowboat, so he grips oars not paddles), sculling back and forwards.”

The boat would go nowhere. A rower would scull in one direction and feather the oars in the other. Also, “back and forth” or “backwards and forwards,” please.

Rubbing his hands on a weeks old stubble, reminded him he should have shaved this morning.”

Weeks without shaving would produce more than stubble.

* Simple bad writing:

Drying off, he meticulously picked out the clothes he would wear that day. Aligning his shirt, pants, underwear, socks and shoes. Carefully putting each garment on, each time smoothing out invisible wrinkles. Moving towards his bedside table, he went to put that treasured object on.”

Aligning…” and “Carefully…” are not sentences. That awful structure is used purposefully throughout the novel. If wrinkles are invisible, are they wrinkles? What is there to smooth out?

Paint flaking off the walls, sprawling of inherent descriptions lining available waiting space.”

I can’t guess what that means.

Hastily they covered her, not noticing a pool of dark liquid, racing to find the nearest constable.”

Blood racing to find a constable?

* Style inconsistencies:

Her model-like height of 5’8 accentuated her thin frame…”

The way she held her five-four inch frame.” We also need the word “foot” after five.

*Aside for history buffs:

This place is filled with cultural influences imbedded (embedded is preferred spelling) from history. The Baths of Lady Maria de Padilla are rainwater tanks. These tanks were named after Maria de Padilla, mistress of Pedro the Cruel. He supposedly killed her husband, but she refused his advances and poured boiling oil over her face so that Pedro would not want her. She became a nun and is a symbol for purity in Seville.”

The passage describes the legend of Maria de Padilla, not the history. She bore at least four children sired by Pedro and whose names are recorded in history.

According to the front matter, the novel was edited by Jeremy Tyler, who bears at least equal responsibility for the multitude of mistakes and a style that embraces inane disregard for grammar. Ultimately, the fault of offering such shoddy work for sale to the public lies with the publisher Whiskey Creek Press.

FYI:

My examples of errors may seem exhaustive, but they scarcely begin to describe the problems with this novel.

Format/Typo Issues:

There are many misspellings, words missing, and unwanted words left in sentences.

He believed he was a god, that’s why I suspect is why they chose him.”

This is also a run-on sentence.

Rating: * One Star

Sunday, June 7, 2015

HealthScare: Why Health Care Is NOT About Your Health / Fritz Scheffel Reviewed by: BigAl


Reviewed by: BigAl

Genre: Non-Fiction

Approximate word count: 30-35,000 words

Availability
Kindle US: YES UK: YES Nook: YES Smashwords: NO Paper: YES
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

Fritz Scheffel spent forty years working in various healthcare jobs--spending twenty of those years as an active retail pharmacist, or pharmacy owner, working with doctors, drug company representatives, nursing homes, health insurance companies, and the public. He gained more experience while selling computer systems to retail, hospital, and institutional pharmacies. Additionally, he worked as a business broker listing and selling pharmacies. During his time in the healthcare industry, pharmacy evolved from a free-enterprise business environment to one controlled by health insurance companies and government entitlement programs.

Fritz suffered a stroke in the spring of 2012 and learned he was a diabetic, which led to firsthand experience of just how the healthcare industry has deteriorated. Determined to speak with people about the industry, Fritz wants to show that a better performing healthcare industry is attainable, and that it will be easier if certain other entities were not involved.”

Description:

How well do you understand what defines your health? Can you wake up one morning and make the decision to go purchase good health? Where would you go? Can you tell Santa Claus that you want him to bring you the gift of good health for Christmas? The federal government and health insurance companies want us to believe that having 'health care' can make you healthy. They have presented health care as a means to your health, but it has turned out to be a con job to take over each American’s access to medical care—decimating health professionals’ ability to treat their patients effectively and at a reasonable cost.”

Appraisal:

Buried among the loads of nonsense, contradictions, biased opinions, unsubstantiated rumors, and impractical ideas that make up the majority of Healthscare are a few reasonable points. One is that the system of providing healthcare in the US is broke. (Few would argue that. The differences in opinion are how to fix it and whether recent changes are helping more than hurting.) Another is that good health, or at least the best health possible for any particular person given their luck in the genetic lottery, is partially dependent on the individual, not just services provided by medical professionals. Last, the author has a definite pet peeve that the term “health care” has become synonymous with health insurance. Obviously health insurance is the means people use to pay for or finance the actual health care services and there is a good case to be made that the system of health insurance has been a significant factor in increasing costs.

However, that's a few reasonable points and a whole lot of solid waste product. I'll briefly hit on just a few representative points to avoid writing an entire book in rebuttal.

Throughout the book it was clear that the author is of the opinion that government is bad, business is good; regulation is bad, and market forces are good. There were exceptions. (The feeling that compounding pharmacies aren't regulated enough is one example of an exception. He also seems to ignore that market forces reacting to drug shortages caused by big drug companies is the reason for these to exist.) Even when he thought business did something bad (large drug companies in one instance), he blamed it on the government, not the businesses.

I won't argue that government is all good (it obviously isn't), nor that businesses never do good. However, I don't trust private businesses which have a duty to maximize their profit within whatever laws limit them to have my best interests at heart. Do you?

Then we've got this quote:

This kind of thinking comes right from socialism, liberalism, progressivism, communism, and Marxism—pick one.

Anyone who thinks these are the same needs a better dictionary or a better 
concept of the shades of gray between black and white. If the quote had you nodding in agreement, consider this alternative.

This kind of thinking comes right from fascism, conservatism, regressivism, and anarchism—pick one.

How fair does that seem?

Next consider this claim:

If we could successfully get rid of Obamacare, everyone would benefit, including the poor. Without the federal government involvement in health care, states would be better positioned to take care of the needy in their state.

To which I would ask, then why didn't they? To be fair, one state, Massachusetts, did do something along these lines that resembled the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare. But why does he think that those states that had done none of these things, some of which are actively doing just the opposite today, would magically change direction if the ACA was repealed? If this kind of illogical wishful thinking is your thing, if you'd like to read fear-mongering, anti-Obamacare predictions (many that have already been debunked or turned out wrong), then this is the book for you. Otherwise, take a pass.

Format/Typo Issues:

A small number of typos or other proofing errors.

Rating: * One Star

Thursday, March 27, 2014

The Perfect Day / Gunnar Angel Lawrence


Reviewed by: BigAl

Genre: Thriller/Suspense

Approximate word count: 120-125,000 words

Availability    
Kindle  US: YES  UK: YES  Nook: YES  Smashwords: YES  Paper: YES
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

“After years of ghostwriting thrillers, conspiracy novels and mystery books, Gunnar Angel Lawrence has published his first thriller. He is a native Floridian with a love for writing thrillers, mysteries and action stories with fast pacing and a unique twist. He lives in Saint Cloud, Florida with his dogs and is currently single.”

For more, visit the author’s blog.

Description:

“A double homicide leads Detective Paul Friedman to discover the threat of an imminent terrorist attack on the city of Orlando, Florida. A young teen girl is found beheaded in the wreckage of what appears to be a freak accident. Friedman learns of The Perfect Day, a plot to strike terror into the hearts of Americans by a zealot known only as Ali the Sand Viper. Friedman must solve the murders and do what he can to prevent the unthinkable, a terrorist assault on the tourism capital of the world.

Reporter Jerome Eisman stumbles onto the plot of a local White Supremacist group to purchase a large quantity of explosives. His investigation takes a frantic turn when bombs begin claiming lives.”

Appraisal:

The Perfect Day has multiple story threads with different point of view characters,  and each contributes to the overall story. Two threads follow Paul Friedman, who I think would be considered the protagonist, and Ali the Sand Viper, the antagonist. Others follow Jerome, a reporter, Monica, an investigator who specializes in uncovering financial fraud, and Gary, a homeless former prisoner of war. Each of these is interwoven with the other and how they relate is obvious with the exception of Gary. I actually liked Gary’s story thread the most even though how it was going to relate to the overall story was unclear until near the end of the book when his story finally connects and set up a plot twist that I didn’t see coming.

I liked the overall plot and thought the author did a good job of character building, with most of the major characters being well rounded with unique personalities, motivations, and goals, all of which figure into the overall story. One exception might be Ali, who comes across as a bit of a cliché through much of the book with only hints of there being something more to him than the obvious until near the end.

However, I had three major issues with The Perfect Day. First are numerous issues with typos and grammar that weren’t caught in the copyediting and proofreading process. In addition to the typical things like typos and verb tense issues that snuck through, were clunky or repetitive sentences like this one:

“I would suggest that before you go off in search of a new client, that you sit down and have a little chat with Sheriff Wilson before you go.”

Or this sequence:

“Sounds good, thanks Nancy. Be honest with me, what am I looking at here, Nancy? Can they really get Jeffrey from me?” Nancy sighed.

In case it isn’t clear, he’s talking to Nancy.

Second was a tendency for the characters who are the apparent heroes of the story, specifically those involved in law enforcement, to have disrespect for the law as it applies to them. One minor example is this exchange earlier in the book where Friedman appears to be okay with vigilante justice. (If nothing else, he doesn’t object.)

“When you find him, please kill him, or let me do it. She was my best friend, and her mother was like my second mom.” Paul nodded, “I understand.” Angie left the room as Paul dialed the station.

Later in the book the chief of police murders (executes would be an even better description) a suspect he has in custody.

My last problem is the book has a definite political stance that I found both objectionable and not very credible. If you describe yourself as an extreme right wing conspiracy theorist, you’ll love this. If you think all Muslims should be assumed to be terrorists (that worked so well for us with those of Japanese ancestry in World War II) and that the media conspires to hide this “fact” from us, you’ll eat this up. For those like me who read this kind of thing and describe it as bull-pucky, it might not be for you.

FYI:

Although this book appears to be the second in a series featuring detective Paul Friedman, it stands alone. There is no need to have read the previous book to understand what is going on in this one.

Format/Typo Issues:

Numerous proofing and copyediting misses.


Rating: * One star