Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Review: Extra Grumpy Trumpy by Stacey Russo


 Genre: Politics/Humor/Parody

Description:

Extra Grumpy Trumpy is the sequel to Grumpy Trumpy no one asked for, but everyone deserves—and let’s just say, the material kept coming. Inspired by more recent events and the ever-growing absurdity of the political landscape, this book practically wrote itself. The hardest part? Deciding what not to include.

Built on the playful repetition and escalating silliness of The Wonky Donkey (but not written by or endorsed by its authors), this sing-songy satire turns chaos into catharsis. It’s packed with clever wordplay and poetic protest for grown-ups who laugh through the madness and rhyme through the rage.

It’s for readers who believe storytelling can be silly, sharp, and subversive all at once. It’s also a playful stand for free expression, a reminder that the First Amendment still matters—and we’re using it with heart, wit, and a healthy dose of rhyme.”

Author:

“Stacey is a mom, business owner, travel enthusiast, and unapologetic beach lover who turned her pet peeves into punchlines. Her writing journey began with parody—sing-songy, satirical books that helped her laugh through the chaos and find humor in the things that bothered her most.”

Appraisal:

If you’re a fan of Trump, this book is definitely not for you. If you’re not a fan this book should give you a good laugh while discussing several reasons why your lack of fandom makes sense. This parodies the style of the Wonky Donkey series of kids picture books in a way that even a pre-school kid could understand. Unfortunately those fans of Trump are unlikely to get it, but you’ll get a good laugh. I’d have never guessed that an adult picture book that looks just like something I’d read to a grandkid would have appeal to me, but I was wrong.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues.

Rating: **** Four Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 24 pages

Monday, November 3, 2025

Review: 10 Little Rules for Understanding America by Danny Zimny-Schmitt


 Genre: Travel/Politics

Description:

“What if the road to understanding American politics runs through every one of its 3,000+ counties?

In this compelling mix of travel memoir and geopolitical insight, the author crisscrosses the country, visiting every county in the US, with one goal: to listen. From diner counters to train stations, coffee shops to rural gas stations, the journey reveals how where we live shapes what we believe—and how we vote.

Inspired by books like The Last American Road Trip and Our Towns, this exploration uncovers the patterns, tensions, and quiet truths that define the American experience today.”

Author:

“Danny Zimny-Schmitt holds degrees in environmental science and geography from the University of Denver and works in the renewable energy industry. Growing up in inner city Chicago, visiting family in Wisconsin, and then moving to Denver for school, he was inspired to learn about the differences between places at an early age. When he's not traveling, he enjoys reading, running, and advocacy work for local nonprofits. He lives in Denver.”

Appraisal:

This series appears to be a set of short reads, each of them with “10 little rules” to help a person in some way, whether that help is what might be classified as “self-help” or to help you understand something that is good to know in a better way. In the process you’ll potentially learn about some other subject that you might be interested in.

This specific volume involves travel and the ways it can expand a person’s view and understanding of the world. Mark Twain has been quoted as saying that “travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness,” (a quote included in this book at an appropriate spot), and that concept is one that runs through this book. The author had a goal of visiting every county or county equivalent in the US. He accomplished that goal and in this book delves a bit into the travel experience, but also what he observed and learned from the experience. A lot of this is political, but makes the point that we aren’t as far apart as it sometimes seems. While a short quick read it also references other articles and studies as well as having links to websites where more information about some places and subjects mentioned can be found. A fun, quick, and thought-provoking read.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues.

Rating: ***** Five Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 15-20,000 words

Monday, August 4, 2025

Review: Political Party & Government Leadership & Succession Globally by Mandla Skhosana


 

Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Description:

“Hillary Clinton-Donald Trump, Trump-Biden (Part 1&2), the demand by niinenteen Democrats Representatives and one Senator for Biden's withdrawal as Democrats' presumptive nominee for the November5, 2024 presidential election, Rishi Sunak- Keir Starmer, Jacob Zuma-Cyril Ramaphosa (Part 1&2), Bolsonaro-Lula Da Silva, Uhuru Kenyatta-William Rutto (Part 1&2), fragmenting, fracturing and splintering political parties and countries like Sudan and the DRC, which are in ICU, become comatose and live off oxygen and await medics' decision to turn off the machine (their demise), and the military leaving the barracks for political office all share one thing in common: politicians involved in a fight to death gladiatorial contest for conquest of power within political parties, the engine of democracy, and governments, the voice of the people in a representative government, a government of the people by the people, regardless of consequences..

The gladiators' fight to death in the arena downplays and disregards completely the truism that whenever two elephants fight the grass suffers. It begs these questions: Why so much bloodletting? Is there no middle ground (third way)?Is the tail wagging the dog?

Should ordinary members of political parties and citizens (Joe Soap and Jane Soap) not come first in leadership and succession contests because politicians, political parties and governments were made for the benefit of rank-and-file members and citizens, and not vice versa?

Leadership and succession processes mimic the multi-headed Hydra Hercules had to conquer. The elephant in the room merits re-examination and re-setting to put people first.”

Author:

Through years of experience in different work environments Mandla Skhosana has observed how leaders approach leading. He is married with six children and five grandchildren.

Appraisal:

In this first of a planned five-volume series the political landscape in multiple countries on at least four different continents is explored. Both how they function and malfunction, from the US, to UK, to a few countries on the African continent, as well as Brazil, the author looks at different methods and ways power gets passed from one leader to the next. It is, as the subtitle of the book, “Ascension-Exit-Ascension-Exit-Never-ending-Cycle,” indicates, the same kind of things over and over again. I found this to be an interesting read. While intended to be aimed for an average person, not an expert in politics and related subjects, I did find the language to feel more like a textbook at times than the books I normally read, but also interesting and something a person like myself, who is interested in politics around the world, would learn and get some new perspectives from reading. For those who want to dig deeper than this goes or question one of the facts provided, extensive footnotes are included to point the way for digging deeper and validating the facts presented.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues

Rating: **** Four Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 15-20,000 words

Monday, July 24, 2023

Review: You Are Not Here by Eric Czuleger


 Genre: Travel Memoir/Non-Fiction/History/Politics

Description:

“American journalist Eric Czuleger dives into the twilight zone of statecraft by living in unrecognized nations in order to discover what a country really is. He begins his journey as a third-grade teacher in Iraqi Kurdistan at the height of the Kurdish independence movement. Banned by Turkey, he pivots to Kosovo where he reports during the nation's 10 year anniversary celebration. Moving on to The Black Hole of Europe, Transnistria, he arrives in time for the Russian election. Finally, Czuleger infiltrates the world's first crypto-anarchist nation, Liberland, where he parties with Bitcoin millionaires and falls into his most challenging position yet: Liberland Ambassador to Somaliland. There, in the never ending desert, he discovers the real cost of drawing a new line in the sand.

You Are Not Here: Travels Through Countries that Don't Exist is part history lesson, memoir, and adventure travelog in the tradition of Bill Bryson, Louis Theroux, and Anthony Bourdain.”

Author:

Eric Czuleger is a playwright with several plays to his credit that have been produced from coast to coast. A former Peace Corps volunteer and the son of a USA Today bestselling novelist, Czuleger has two novels he’s written that are available as well as his most recent release, a travel memoir.

Appraisal:

I’ve been a fan of travel memoirs for many decades. As an avid traveler I find myself comparing the travel memoir author’s experience with my own, if they visit a place I’ve been, and travel with them vicariously if it is a place I haven’t been. Some of the experiences I read about I’m unlikely to experience by myself. I guarantee I’m never going to hike the entire length of the Appalachian Trail, but have read multiple books to experience it vicariously. I feel extremely safe saying that those things Eric Czuleger experienced and the places he visited that are chronicled in this book are not things I will ever experience or places I’m likely to visit, but I can definitely learn from his experience. And I did.

The places Eric traveled to and chronicled in this book are places that see themselves as a country, just like the United States, Canada, or France is a country, but few, if any of the other countries in the world agree. Eric experiences the unique culture of these places, sometimes disconcerting and possibly a bit on the dangerous side. He observes the people and does what he can to get a feel for the impact of this country’s status with the rest of the world on its people. The theme running through the entire book is an attempt to decide exactly what it is that makes a country a country. Will he come up with the ultimate answer that we’ll all agree with? I’ll let you read and decide. Whatever the answer to that question, his exploration and consideration of this was an interesting exercise that got me thinking a lot about not only countries that might not be an actual country, but also about the differences, both good and not so good, to those places that clearly are countries.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

FYI:

A small amount of adult language.

Format/Typo Issues:

Review is based on a pre-release ARC (advance reader copy) and I can’t gauge the final product based on this version.

Rating: ***** Five Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 90-95,000 words

Friday, August 6, 2021

Review: Operation Chaos by Kevin James Shay


Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Description:

“January 6, 2021, will live in infamy in American history, along with September 11, 2001, and other dates. For the first time in the country's history, a sitting president rallied a violent mob to try to overturn a legitimate election in a real-life horror story that saw the U.S. come close to falling into an authoritative nightmare.

While many blamed the Trump supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol and even political opponents for the violence, Operation Chaos shows how the attack was a clandestine operation coordinated and supported by top Trump aides and even the president himself. In fact, the title of the book came from a dirty trick ploy that Trump and backers executed in early 2020 to disrupt Democratic Party primaries. After that operation failed, Trump and his schemers ratcheted up their dark activities by several levels, climaxing with Operation Occupy the Capitol, a campaign employed by grassroots GOP operatives at the urging of Trump and party leaders. The operations employed the trend of political extremist groups to work in leaderless cells, with top leaders issuing orders through code words and general social media and app messages to attempt to avoid legal prosecution.

To document this story, veteran journalist Kevin James Shay, who has worked in the Washington, D.C., area for almost two decades, poured over public documents from the FBI, police departments, federal, state, and local governments, and other government agencies. He reviewed hundreds of news articles, videos, broadcasts, studies, and reports, and interviewed sources himself. He analyzed posts on Twitter, Facebook, and other social media feeds. Approaching this story as a true crime tale involving chaotic deceit and deception that have been ongoing for years, he pieces together clues that help readers better understand how and why the tragedy occurred, uncovering fresh details and writing the story in a moving narrative that gives behind-the-scenes perspective.”

Author:

After graduating from the University of North Texas in 1981 Kevin James Shay did the obvious, started writing for magazines, newspapers, and other journalistic outlets. He’s also managed to write several books, some showing his interest in travel and others more in keeping with his vocation, covering subjects such as history, journalism, and politics.

For more, check out Shay’s posts on Medium.

Appraisal:

I think it would be fair to say that I have ambiguous feelings about this book. I’m also not sure if those ambiguous feelings are a good thing or a bad thing. We’ll start with what the book got best, at least from my point of view. It does a great job of documenting the invasion of the US Capitol Building on January 6, 2021 and the many pertinent factors and circumstances that led to this climactic event. It is also extensively footnoted so the reader will know where the author got much of the information he is presenting and you can gauge the credibility or potentially even go check out the source yourself if you wanted to dig deeper. One minor nit I’d pick with these footnotes is that I would have liked the footnotes in the ebook version to have been linked so that if a particular statement made me want to dig deeper, I could easily click (or tap with my finger since I’m using a Kindle) on the footnote to find the source, do whatever investigation I wanted to do, and then easily return to where I’d left off using the back function on my Kindle. But that’s a minor formatting concern, not a concern with the content itself.

Where the content is concerned, I found it very credible, but I’m also concerned that my personal biases might be at work in that regard. I was already aware of a large share of the things outlined here, however reviewing them all one right after the other en masse by reading this book drove home those conclusions I’d already come to. Those things I hadn’t already read about only reinforced those feelings. My suspicion is that those who have an opinion about these events that fits with mine would find this book to be a worthwhile read if they wanted a review of the facts and to possibly expand their knowledge about the factors involved.

For those who have an opinion the opposite of mine, reading this book with an open mind might lead them to a different conclusion, but I have my doubts. My main reason for thinking that is that the author’s bias comes through in a few ways that I think would make me concerned if I wasn’t in agreement with him. One representative example has to do with masks. During the coronavirus pandemic many states had rules regarding the wearing of masks in public places, especially inside buildings, but some states and situations even required masks be worn outside. Some people, those that leaned far right politically being one example (since the government wasn’t going to tell them what to do), had a tendency to ignore those rules during this time. The author constantly pointed out when a group of people was taking some action in the book that the participants were “mostly maskless.” It reached the point of overkill. Especially later when he described those invading the US Capitol saying that “many wore bandanas and masks, along with headgear, to better hide their identities from security cameras.” They may well have worn the masks for that reason and the masks they wore might not have been different from those most wore to minimize the spreading of germs, but I also knew that if they hadn’t worn the masks he’d have pointed that out as pertinent too. Not that these people deserve anyone to cut them any slack, but at least where the issue of masks is concerned, they could do no right.

In summary, if you think Trump instigated the invasion of the Capitol Building and you want to see all the evidence to support that in one place, this is a book for you. If you’ve got no opinion, you might give it a shot too. Others … I better not say any more.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK

FYI:

Some adult language.

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues.

Rating: **** Four Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 80-85,000 words

Friday, July 23, 2021

Reprise Review: Side Effects: What Candidates Don't Tell You by Tomas Payne

 


Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Description:

Side-Effects: What Candidates Don’t Tell You takes you behind the scenes on issues of the day and campaign promises. It focuses on consequences, issues, and options. It also challenges myths such as who are the wealthy, and what is the history of depressed wages. The emphasis is on shedding light, exposing myths, examining consequences, and exploring options, not on personalities. Sorry, no dirt on the people, just on their promises.

Side-Effects will answer questions such as:

Will raising income and estate taxes hurt the billionaires and redistribute wealth?

Why healthcare is broken and what options we have.

Why wages are depressed and what we can do about it.

What are the implications of various immigration plans?

Side-Effects cuts through the BS to look at campaign promises on wealth redistribution, taxes, Social Security, healthcare, depressed wages, and many other topics that aims to bring facts to these issues.”

Author:

“Author is a CPA and has an MBA in finance, a BS in Political Science, and over 30 years of experience in business. He is a long time student of business, the ever-entertaining field of economics, and of the political shell game.

Like many of you, he is frustrated by candidates not addressing the real issues or doing so with simplistic sound bites that don't stand up to scrutiny. That's why he dove into campaign promises to see how they fared and found a number of surprises he'd like to share with you.”

Appraisal:

Of all the books I've ever read on contemporary politics, this book has some qualities that I've never seen before. Depending on what you'd prefer to get from a book like this, you could perceive those qualities as positive or negative.

In the early days of the US, political theorist Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet called Common Sense and now an author with essentially the same name (maybe Tomas Payne is a pen name?) shows a lot of common sense in exploring the current political environment in the US. Payne explains his thinking clearly and in multiple instances had me questioning my current political stances. If that possibility concerns you, this book isn't for you. No matter where you fall on the political spectrum you'll almost surely find that Payne agrees with you on some things and disagrees on others. If you're willing to have your thoughts and political beliefs challenged, this book will do the trick.

Buy now from:    Amazon US        Amazon UK

FYI:

Original review posted June 24, 2016.

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues

Rating: ***** Five Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl

Approximate word count: 55-60,000 words

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Review: Against the Oaks of Bashan by Julia Starling

Today's review is the first from a new pal, Average Jeff.


Genre: Political/Sci-Fi

Description:

In 1970s Buenos Aires, with the city under military occupation, people disappear at a terrifying rate. They are the desaparecidos, those who vanish forever.

Camouflaged by the ongoing crisis, someone abducts young adults for another goal. These desaparecidos are used to create a compliant, easily-manipulated population.

Lucas and Vera Freund are among those abducted. The young couple—both brilliant scientists—have stumbled onto a discovery that could change humanity forever. To shield their work from those who would abuse it, they’re willing to make the ultimate sacrifice. Years later, Frances Fons and Julian Haller meet in Zurich. They know nothing of the horrors that transpired in Argentina.”

Author:

The is Julia Starling's first book: Against the Oaks of Bashan. Starling “is a medical doctor and psychotherapist. Born and raised in Buenos Aires, Argentina, she spent five years in the UK finishing her clinical studies and then moved to California to complete her psychotherapy training. She currently lives in Northern New Mexico with her husband.”

Appraisal:

The Oaks of Bashan opens wonderfully, with an ingrown biblical ceremony of contrition, complete with gargoyle-like incantations. It fits neatly with the book’s title, the allusion to Bashan, a terrible battleground in the Book of Genesis that remains a terrible battleground today, the Golan Heights between Syria and Israel. And, to my delight, the next chapter of the Oaks leaped across time to land among the preparations for a sulfurous lawn party. Wonderful. But just as I reached for the petit fours, I stumbled over the first of many leaf piles of impassable adjectives.

The Oak’s descriptions got told and elaborated upon and tormented until they betrayed more than they revealed. “People marveled at her ability to create the most exquisitely delicate tastes, to tap into pleasures of times gone—and often speculated on the intriguing juxtaposition of the seemingly earthy predisposition, this almost peasant-like simplicity, with the perfumed air of French aristocracy that emanated from her indifferent, icy urban demeanor.”

And so on. What started with two moody chapters intimating an era of political horrors fell down the rabbit hole of melodrama. Where there was the appearance of story development, it clogged with flummery that failed to drive the story forward. No single scene gained purchase enough to mount the rungs on the ladder of suspense. Language substituted for action. Pronouns quailed for antecedents, and adjectives turned on each other with the noble aim of contrast but succumbed to conflict. “A peasant-like simplicity” crashed against “the perfumed air of French aristocracy,” which was then mugged by the chef’s “icy, urban demeanor.” Contrast? Yes. Laborious? Yes. Rule: No fifty-word sentence about a victimized wife whose foodie talents grow byzantine should go unedited.

Against the Oakes of Bashan had so much going for it when it began, but its trees never grew into a forest; maybe it was all those leaf piles. What was advertised as a tale of Argentina’s political horrors driven by the turbines of sci-fi doom has its possibilities. But the author’s work was felled by its own axe. Too bad. It all started so well.

Buy now from:    Amazon US    Amazon UK

FYI:

The reader would do well to know some Spanish, or take classes. Where, in some works, the use of foreign terms piques a description, the use of Spanish nouns, possibly Argentine idioms, in this book, lost me.

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues.

Rating: ** Two Stars

Review by: Average Jeff

Word Count: 65-70,000 words

Friday, June 24, 2016

Side Effects: What Candidates Don't Tell You by Tomas Payne


Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Description:
Side-Effects: What Candidates Don’t Tell You takes you behind the scenes on issues of the day and campaign promises. It focuses on consequences, issues, and options. It also challenges myths such as who are the wealthy, and what is the history of depressed wages. The emphasis is on shedding light, exposing myths, examining consequences, and exploring options, not on personalities. Sorry, no dirt on the people, just on their promises.

Side-Effects will answer questions such as:
Will raising income and estate taxes hurt the billionaires and redistribute wealth?
Why healthcare is broken and what options we have.
Why wages are depressed and what we can do about it.
What are the implications of various immigration plans?

Side-Effects cuts through the BS to look at campaign promises on wealth redistribution, taxes, Social Security, healthcare, depressed wages, and many other topics that aims to bring facts to these issues.”

Author:
Author is a CPA and has an MBA in finance, a BS in Political Science, and over 30 years of experience in business. He is a long time student of business, the ever-entertaining field of economics, and of the political shell game.
Like many of you, he is frustrated by candidates not addressing the real issues or doing so with simplistic sound bites that don't stand up to scrutiny. That's why he dove into campaign promises to see how they fared and found a number of surprises he'd like to share with you.”

Appraisal:
Of all the books I've ever read on contemporary politics, this book has some qualities that I've never seen before. Depending on what you'd prefer to get from a book like this, you could perceive those qualities as positive or negative.
In the early days of the US, political theorist Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet called Common Sense and now an author with essentially the same name (maybe Tomas Payne is a pen name?) shows a lot of common sense in exploring the current political environment in the US. Payne explains his thinking clearly and in multiple instances had me questioning my current political stances. If that possibility concerns you, this book isn't for you. No matter where you fall on the political spectrum you'll almost surely find that Payne agrees with you on some things and disagrees on others. If you're willing to have your thoughts and political beliefs challenged, this book will do the trick.

Buy now from:    Kindle US     Kindle UK

Format/Typo Issues:
No significant issues

Rating: ***** Five Stars

Reviewed by: BigAl


Approximate word count: 55-60,000 words

Friday, March 11, 2016

Review: Democracy On The Edge by @TerryAAmrhein



Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics
Description: 
The author explores a number of landmark events in U.S. government and judiciary history that have induced such upheavals as runaway spending on political campaigns and financial deregulation that lead to the subprime financial crisis and continues to threaten stability.
Author: 
Terry A. AmRhein graduated from the University of Virginia with a Bachelor of Science degree in physics. He “was raised in a family that was very interested in political discussion. As a youth, I used to sit around the kitchen table and listen to ‘grown-ups’ discuss the cold war, business, unions, and communism. I think it is natural then that I continue to have an interest in politics. 
I have published one other book, The Newcomers Guide to Winning Location Elections, and live in Vermont with my wife. I have two children and three delightful grandchildren.”
Appraisal:
AmRhein is the quintessential citizen scholar, an engineer and scientist gifted with common sense and lucidity that seems to have escaped some of the nation's Supreme Court justices and legislators. 
With campaign spending in the current presidential race expected to exceed $1 billion, the chapter on Super PACs is particularly timely. AmRhein details how in 2010 the Supreme Court overturned a century of controls on political spending and gutted the McCain-Feingold Act intended to curb the influence of moneyed interests. 
The vote in the Citizens United case was five to four, with an impassioned dissent against applying the rights of free speech to corporations and other organizations including the freedom to spend limitlessly to influence political outcomes. The author sides with the dissent and suggests a simple remedy.
Chapters on Business in America and the Financial Crisis provide painful evidence that when freed from the constraints of governmental oversight, enough business folk and financiers will put greed ahead of the common good. The author details how deregulation that overturned the Taft-Hartley Act separating commercial and investment banking led to the 2008 financial crisis. Despite implementation of the Dodd-Frank act, intended to restore order, the author writes that mega financial conglomerates are actually gaining market share.
AmRhein takes shots at deniers of global warming and opponents of gun control and universal health care. He also provides extensive data showing that supply side economics really is "voodoo" that gives the mojo to the massively wealthy at the expense of a declining middle-class. Tea Party "logic" takes a hit along with anyone comfortable embracing mutually contradictory opinions.
The book presents complex issues in clean simplicity and provides extensive sourcing for anyone interested in pursuing further study.

Buy now from:            Amazon US        Amazon UK
     
FYI:
While I highly recommend the work, there were a few areas that I consider problematic, including the carelessly written: 
"In other words, by using the Federal Reserve Bank, the government can adjust interest rates to increase economic growth." 
The Fed, of course, conducts monetary policy, including interest rate adjustments on its own initiative, not at the behest of government. 
The author also suggests it would be a good idea to ban tobacco products in the U.S., which might do more to enrich criminal elements than to reduce usage. Prohibition didn't work, after all.

Format/Typo Issues:
There are a plethora of errors in syntax, grammar and spelling, such as the cringe inducing "Social Society Administration" instead of Social Security. 
Rating: **** Four stars
Reviewed by: Sam Waite

Approximate page count: 256 pages

Sunday, January 24, 2016

Review: America IS Exceptional by Steven L Hall


Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Description:

The Idea of America led to independent sovereign States, then to a Constitution and a new Union. The results of this 'American Experiment' were exceptional. Phase One, the first 120 years or so, marked a quantum leap in the standard of living and wealth, the result of a free people living under the Rule of Law. In Phase Two, since about 1900, America has diverged from its founding principles; today we find a country exceptional in many other ways, some of them not so positive. We are now entering Phase Three, and it is critical that more Americans are involved in the democratic process; that they identify their core beliefs; that they learn about our founding principles; and that they understand the politics and economics that are affecting our future as a nation. Throughout history great nations have risen and fallen; there is no guarantee that the American Experiment will survive. But it should. Liberty, the recognition of unalienable human Rights, and the Rule of Law are critically important. Freedom, however, is not free. This book started out as a series of letters and rants to my kids and grandkids, an attempt to help them learn about the issues facing us. It is for anyone who believes in the Idea of America and wants to participate in keeping the American Experiment alive.”

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Couch Potato Politics / Mark A. Prior


Reviewed by: BigAl

Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Approximate word count: 65-70,000 words

Availability    
Kindle  US: YES  UK: YES  Nook: YES  Smashwords: YES  Paper: YES
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

Born in Rhode Island and raised in New York and Georgia, Mark Prior now lives in Los Angeles where he works as a screenwriter and, for his “survival job,” as a stagehand and lighting technician.

Description:

Mark Prior believes that government in the US is becoming (has become?) dysfunctional and explains the reason for this as lack of involvement. In his words, “America has become a nation of political couch potatoes and that's what's screwing us up!” In this book he discusses the political process, his suggestions for turning things around, and some specific areas where he believes we’re headed the wrong direction with his take on the reasons we’re headed that way and some suggested solutions.

Appraisal:

Couch Potato Politics has numerous issues that should have been fixed in the final polish of copy editing and proofreading and weren’t. The most common are extra or extraneous words (“… choosing of that date to to make their point …” or “… an area populated by primarily by …”) and homonym errors (peace vs piece, bare vs bear, isle versus aisle, and reign versus rein are a few examples I saw multiple times). Unless you’re a reader very tolerant of these kinds of issues, you’ll find yourself tripping over a sentence often. This problem is the primary reason for the low ranking and is something that could potentially be fixed.

However, if you feel that a lack of polish doesn’t matter if the story being told or, in this case, the message being delivered is worthwhile, then you might want to consider this book. If you aren’t happy with government, but aren’t involved in making things better, you probably should.

Although originally conceived as a series of essays on the politics of various subjects, you’ll find, as the author did, that there is a theme running through these essays which I’ll summarize as “if we sit on our couch and don’t get involved in politics, we’ll get what the people who are involved want instead.” And as he points out numerous times, what we end up with is a combination of solutions dominated by ideas from the more extreme ends of the political spectrum, laws beholden to special interests, or inaction when action is needed due to partisan gridlock.

Prior describes his politics as “moderate” (neither clearly to the right or left) although tending to be slightly conservative on fiscal matters and a touch liberal on questions of social policy. However, he makes the point that you have to investigate and consider each issue on its own merits, and you’ll see that on some issues he argues for a solution that goes against his natural leanings while explaining why. I would expect the vast majority of people would agree with Prior’s take on policy because, almost by definition, most people are going to fall in the middle of the political spectrum. Prior is also not a political commentator or acknowledged expert on the subject. He’s just a regular guy, maybe a lot like you, who has done what he believes you need to do for yourself, investigate and let your voice be heard.

Do you consider yourself in the mainstream and mostly ignore politics? Is it because you don’t think you can make a difference, assume it will all work out without you, or don’t see why you should care? If so, this book is meant for you. It delivers a message you need to receive and take to heart. I only wish it did so with more polish.

FYI:

Rare instances of adult language.

Format/Typo Issues:

Numerous proofing and copy editing issues.


Rating: *** Three stars

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Card Declined, How Britain Said No to ID Cards Three Times Over / SA Mathieson

This is the second half of a double shot. If you missed it, look for Keith Nixon's take on the same book this morning.


Reviewed by: BigAl

Genre: Non-Fiction/Politics

Approximate word count: 30-35,000 words

Availability    
Kindle  US: YES  UK: YES  Nook: NO  Smashwords: NO  Paper: YES
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:
SA Mathieson is a journalist and author. He specializes in healthcare IT and management and contributes regularly to blogs and publications such as the Guardian newspaper on these subjects.

You can learn more about the author on his website.

Description:

In Card Declined… the author traces the historical facts regarding Britain’s use, abolition and attempts to reintroduce an identity card scheme over the period 1945 – 2011.

Appraisal:

This book discusses the history of a movement to institute a program requiring a national ID card in Britain. A political battle that raged on and off for several years, a law was ultimately passed and then repealed before it could be fully implemented. I thought it would be interesting to read this from the viewpoint of an American, not just to see the differences in the political systems of Britain and the US, but also what we might learn from Britain’s experience in a few related political battles going on here. I’ll start with a quote from the book

Americans have a written constitution that states that “we the people” are sovereign. Britain doesn’t, and many people (including Tony Benn) talk about a ‘they’ who are responsible for all manner of things – which means they can take the blame, too.

At least in theory that quote should get to the heart of the differences between the two systems. But at least from what I read here, although the political process of passing a law may not be the same, in how it functioned (or didn’t) I couldn’t see much difference. There was partisan bickering between the majority and minority parties, with gamesmanship seeming to matter more than doing what was right. In the next election the majority and minority might change, but the game didn’t. There was plenty of money wasted and in the end, nothing of worth (from any perspective on the political spectrum) was accomplished.

However, I did notice some similarities and two significant differences between this political battle in Britain and two current issues in the US, specifically voter ID laws and some laws that have been passed in some states allowing law enforcement to demand proof of citizenship. One difference I saw was that the changes are generally being proposed by parties on different ends of the political spectrum, with those from the liberal end championing the ID laws in Britain and those from the conservative side proposing these laws in the US. The other difference is the proposed changes in the US aren’t as sweeping, in that they wouldn’t require everyone to have a specific form of ID, but would potentially require people who currently have no need for accepted forms of ID to obtain one of them. Rather than argue either for or against, I’ll point out a few of the ideas raised in Card Denied that seem pertinent to the US and the laws under consideration here.

The first is this quote from an opponent which sounds familiar to those who have paid attention to discussions of voter ID laws in the US. “This is a rare victory for civil liberties. ID cards were a solution looking for a problem.”

The main objection to the ID cards in Britain is that it would provide the government a means of tracking too much about a person, in essence making it easy to invade privacy. The law that eventually passed gained favor with politicians in the wake of 9/11, not unlike the passing of The Patriot Act in the US. In the wake of recent terrorist acts in the US, we should be on guard for attempts from either party to shove through laws using this as an excuse.

Last is this quote, which is applicable in many ways to the issues being discussed in the US:

“My biggest objection, of many to this scheme, is the impact I know it will have on racial minorities,” she added. “It won’t be the home secretary, or his family, or people that look like him, that get hassled for their ID card in a doctor’s surgery, on the street, at every port and call. It will be people who look like me. That is the experience of every European country that has compulsory identity cards.”

Card Denied raised the specter of 1984 and how ID cards allowed Big Brother to track every citizen. Although the US is nowhere near that, we need to scrutinize proposals taking us more in that direction and decide whether they are solving a problem or only helping put us in Big Brother’s sights.

Format/Typo Issues:

No significant issues

Rating: **** Four stars

Card Declined, How Britain Said No to ID Cards Three Times Over / SA Mathieson



This is the first half of a double shot. Look for BigAl's take on this book this afternoon.


Reviewed by: Keith Nixon

Genre: Politics

Approximate word count: 30-35,000 words

Availability    
Kindle  US: YES  UK: YES  Nook: NO  Smashwords: NO  Paper: YES
Click on a YES above to go to appropriate page in Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Smashwords store

Author:

SA Mathieson is a journalist and author. He specializes in healthcare IT and management and contributes regularly to blogs and publications such as the Guardian newspaper on these subjects.

You can learn more about the author on his website.

Description:

In Card Declined… the author traces the historical facts regarding Britain’s use, abolition and attempts to reintroduce an identity card scheme over the period 1945 – 2011.

Appraisal:

This is a difficult book to review simply because it is so niche – the focus, as previously outlined, is on the identity card scheme in the UK, which has, over time, caused significant controversy. As this has been, and continues to be, a political process the narrative is intertwined with politics, politicians and therefore farce.

From a technical perspective the book is extremely well written, the author is clearly a very experienced writer. I could not find fault with the grammar, prose, punctuation etc. For such a potentially dry subject the author manages to generate interest and the events flow with surprising speed. It is clearly extremely well researched too. 31% of the book is given over to references, some 269 separate items.

However, unless the reader has a specific interest in identity cards and politics the subject matter may be a turn off. I’m not an incredibly political person myself and I drifted every now and again. Although I recognize and stress that this is entirely a personal view.

Overall Card Declined… was engaging, very well written and meticulously researched.

FYI:

No issues.

Format/Typo Issues:

None. Very well edited.

Rating: **** Four Stars