Genre:
Contemporary Fiction
Description:
“After
the heartbreak of losing their newborn son to a previously
undiagnosed genetic condition, Phillip and Anna Lewinsky managed to
patch their lives back together and move forward, filling the
emptiness with friends, work, and travel.
When Anna
unexpectedly finds herself pregnant again at the age of forty-three,
Phillip is thrilled to have a second chance at fatherhood in spite of
Anna’s objections.
As desires
clash, misunderstandings abound, and decisions are irrevocably made,
the foundation of their marriage begins to crumble until only tragedy
remains.”
Author:
“Melinda
Clayton is the author of Appalachian
Justice, Return
to Crutcher Mountain,
Entangled Thorns,
and Blessed Are the Wholly
Broken. Clayton has published
numerous articles and short stories in various print and online
magazines. In addition to writing, Dr. Clayton has an Ed.D. in
Special Education Administration and is a licensed psychotherapist in
the states of Florida and Colorado.”
You can
also find Ms. Clayton at IndiesUnlimited, where she
contributes a monthly post on any- and everything related to
self-publishing. To learn more please check out her website.
Appraisal:
Given a
choice, I’d prefer to like a book and give it a good review than
the opposite. Yet, it seems writing a negative or even lukewarm
review is much easier. Articulating why a book didn’t work for me
is normally easy, usually a matter of listing which common faults I
found, both of a technical nature (inadequate proofing, grammar
problems, convoluted verbiage) and issues with the story (inadequate
or too much characterization, lack of conflict, nonsensical plot
points) with examples.
You’d
think a good review would be a matter of working from the same mental
list of what can go wrong and explaining that it didn’t. Sometimes
I do just that. But how many times can a reviewer say “fun (or
entertaining) story, good characters, buy this book?” Even if the
readers of the review don’t notice, the reviewer knows and feels
like he or she is repeating the same old thing. It may not bore you,
but sometimes it bores me writing it. Often the books I like the most
are the toughest to figure out how to explain why. Blessed
Are the Wholly Broken is one
of those books.
Melinda
Clayton’s first novel, Appalachian
Justice, has been on my short
list of books to recommend to others since I first read it. This book
is as good in its own way, but much different. Maybe the way to get
at the appeal of this book is to compare and contrast the two. The
main characters in Appalachian
Justice (I’ll abbreviate the
two books as AJ
and BWB
going forward), due to the environment they were born into, both have
much to overcome just to survive. Although one of the characters in
BWB
was born into a situation that isn’t much better, when we pick up
his story he appears to have moved beyond his troubled beginnings
(whether that is actually true, I’ll leave to the reader to
decide). In any case, the characters and the setting of the story in
BWB
are going to feel more familiar, a lot more like what the typical
reader has experienced in their own life than those in AJ.
The story
conflict, those things the characters need to overcome, is also
something most readers will more easily be able to relate to their
own life or someone they know, even if they’d handle the conflict
in a different way. Another difference between the two is the overall
tenor of each story. While both have emotional ups and downs, AJ
is much more positive and ends on an emotional high while BWB
is the opposite, darker throughout with enough of the ending hinted
at in the prologue lurking in the readers head to temper even the
happiest points in the book.
In the end,
both are excellent stories, but much different reading experiences.
Picking a favorite would be tough and ultimately comes down to the
reader’s taste.
FYI:
Some adult
content.
Added
for Reprise Review: Blessed
Are the Wholly Broken was a
nominee in the Contemporary/General Fiction category for B&P 2014
Readers' Choice Awards. Original review ran December 10, 2013.
Approximate
word count: 60-65,000 words
Format/Typo
Issues:
No
significant issues
Rating:
***** Five stars
Reviewed
by: BigAl
2 comments:
Thank you! :-)
I have noticed lately that BigAl doesn't reprise the reviews he has written as often as he does the other Pal reviews. I am trying to correct that. :D
Post a Comment